It's easy to understand why USA prefer to use Overall medals against Gold medals. USA benefited from this method at 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics when China came up top with 51 golds compared to USA's 36. But USA had 10 more total medals than China. Question is why Canada is also adopting Total Medal Count Method? Are we just following our 'big' neighbours? Apparently, Canada initially assumed the best chance of topping the medal table is by overall medals. This is the concept behind Own the Podium campaign. Nobody may have expected Canadian athletes to win record number of gold medals. After-all we had to first break the home gold jinx. After an unexpected late gold rush by Canadian athletes, now it's too late to change our definition of winner. Our own Vancouver 2010 website will forever show USA has won the Olympics and Canada came in third, while rest of the World will show that Canada has comprehensively won their home Olympics with a records gold medal tally. How ironic.
"Ironically, Canada have fallen short of their own definition of success which was to win more medals - of any colour - than any other team. The vast majority of countries judge Olympic success on the basis of the number of golds won" - BBC Sports
The Buffalo Bill have lost the Super Bowl three times (3 silver medals). The Tampa Bucaneers have won one Super Bowl (1 gold medal). Which team has bragging rights??
ReplyDeleteI hope the Americans are proud to have been awarded the most medals for losing. Go Canada!!